How Should We Then Live Free Essay Example, 1250 words

In the book How Now Shall We Live it is said Because something is legal does not make it right. Nor can the will of the majority be confused with the will of God. They may be very different; in fact, they often are . This sentence was used in Colson s argument over the Vietnam War and his desire to lay his life down in his country s defense. Thus it can be said that society today has become so modernized that it is near impossible for the individual to try to make moral judgments by using God s words and defying those of man. This can lead to a contradiction between the individual and the State because the world today follows a dictum that is not similar to that of God s. To this Schaeffer states Humanism has no final way of saying certain things are right and other things are wrong. For the humanist, the final thing which exists that is, the impersonal universe is neutral and silent about right and wrong, cruelty and non-cruelty. Humanism has no means to give absolutes; thus as a regular consequence of humanism s standing, humanism in private morals and political life is left with that which is absolutely arbitrary. Today, almost every developed and the successful world follows the policies of a democratic charter. We will write a custom essay sample on How Should We Then Live or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page People are distinctive in the inner life of their mind what they are in their thought world leads to how they would behave by all means. This is fair and true of their value systems; it is true of their creativity. This also stands as the truth for their corporate actions, such as political decisions, and it is also a true point for their personal lives". Schaeffer warns of a world where sociological law will take over any stable authority. This will allow the authority to state anything it wants as illegal by using the majority vote, even if it defies all forms of humanity.